From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stiffel

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Nov 26, 1969
61 Misc. 2d 1100 (N.Y. App. Term 1969)

Opinion

November 26, 1969

Appeal from the District Court of Nassau County, ALFRED F. SAMENGA, J.

Speno, Goldberg, Moore Margules ( Clifford A. Royael of counsel), for appellants.

William Cahn, District Attorney ( Gino Papa of counsel), for respondent.


Wagering by the participants on the outcome of a game of skill is not gambling and billiards is a game of skill ( People ex rel. Ellison v. Lavin, 179 N.Y. 164).

The judgments of conviction should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts, information dismissed and fine remitted.

Concur — HOGAN, P.J., GULOTTA and GLICKMAN, JJ.

Judgments reversed, etc.


Summaries of

People v. Stiffel

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Nov 26, 1969
61 Misc. 2d 1100 (N.Y. App. Term 1969)
Case details for

People v. Stiffel

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ARTHUR R. STIFFEL and…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1969

Citations

61 Misc. 2d 1100 (N.Y. App. Term 1969)
308 N.Y.S.2d 64

Citing Cases

White v. Cuomo

s the dominating element that determines the result of the game" ( id. at 170–171, 71 N.E. 753 [emphasis…

White v. Cuomo

Applying this dominating element test, we concluded it was "perfectly clear that the dominating and…