From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stewart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 20, 2006
30 A.D.3d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-08628.

June 20, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered August 31, 2005, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Mark Diamond, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (David R. Huey of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Florio, J.P., Santucci, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal ( see People v. Saunders, 19 AD3d 744; People v. Ciatto, 290 AD2d 560; People v. Walsh, 243 AD2d 590). Although the waiver did not preclude review of the defendant's claim that his plea was not voluntarily or knowingly made, this claim is unpreserved for appellate review since the defendant did not move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction on that ground ( see People v. Hussain, 309 AD2d 818; People v. Harrell, 288 AD2d 489; People v. Sierra, 256 AD2d 598).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Stewart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 20, 2006
30 A.D.3d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM STEWART…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 20, 2006

Citations

30 A.D.3d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 5045
816 N.Y.S.2d 381

Citing Cases

State of N.Y. v. Cooper

The defendant's claim that the court erred in failing to, sua sponte, order an examination to determine if he…

People v. Williams

The defendant contends that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent because the County…