From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Soman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 14, 1966
53 Misc. 2d 452 (N.Y. App. Term 1966)

Opinion

December 14, 1966

Appeal from the Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of Kings, RADER, MALTER and CREEL, JJ.

Benjamin Gollay for appellant.

Aaron E. Koota, District Attorney ( Michael Schwartz of counsel), for respondent.


Defendant's guilt was not established beyond a reasonable doubt. In any event it was improper to convict defendant of attempted malicious mischief. a crime with which she was not charged. Although a defendant indicted for a felony may be convicted of an attempt to commit such crime, without being specifically charged therewith (Penal Law, § 610), no similar authority is found in the New York City Criminal Court Act with regard to misdemeanors. We disapprove of the loose practice of reducing criminal charges against a defendant and then proceeding to trial without the formality of filing a new complaint or information, and without a new arraignment.

The judgment of conviction should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts, and complaint dismissed.

Concur — MARGETT, SCHWARTZWALD and CONE, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

People v. Soman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 14, 1966
53 Misc. 2d 452 (N.Y. App. Term 1966)
Case details for

People v. Soman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EVELYN SOMAN, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Dec 14, 1966

Citations

53 Misc. 2d 452 (N.Y. App. Term 1966)
278 N.Y.S.2d 657

Citing Cases

People v. Martini

Term, 1st Dept., 1967]. Contra: People v. Soman, 53 Misc.2d 452 [App. Term, 2d Dept.,…

People v. Gingello

In People v. Todaro ( 26 N.Y.2d 325) defendant was charged with disorderly conduct and harassment, and the…