From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Snebold

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Apr 25, 1961
191 Cal.App.2d 514 (Cal. Ct. App. 1961)

Opinion

Docket No. 3856.

April 25, 1961.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Marin County denying a petition for writ of error coram nobis. Thomas F. Keating, Judge. Affirmed.

Charles Henry Snebold, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, Arlo E. Smith and John L. Burton, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.


Snebold appeals from an order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. On October 1, 1958, he was convicted of a violation of Penal Code, section 4502, possession of a deadly weapon while a prisoner committed to a state prison. He says that on the date of his conviction he was told by an assistant warden, in substance, that the latter had planted the weapon, a knife, on him.

[1] Newly discovered evidence is a ground for motion for a new trial (Pen. Code, §§ 1181, 1182). Under these circumstances, coram nobis is not available, "even though the facts upon which the application for the writ is based were not discovered until too late to present them upon a motion for new trial." ( People v. Cox, 18 Cal.App.2d 283, 286 [ 63 P.2d 849]; see also People v. Tuthill, 32 Cal.2d 819, 821-822 [ 198 P.2d 505]; People v. Blalock, 53 Cal.2d 798, 801 [ 349 P.2d 953].)

Affirmed.

Bray, P.J., and Tobriner, J., concurred.

Appellant's petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied June 21, 1961.


Summaries of

People v. Snebold

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Apr 25, 1961
191 Cal.App.2d 514 (Cal. Ct. App. 1961)
Case details for

People v. Snebold

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent v. CHARLES HENRY SNEBOLD, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One

Date published: Apr 25, 1961

Citations

191 Cal.App.2d 514 (Cal. Ct. App. 1961)
12 Cal. Rptr. 827

Citing Cases

People v. Welch

[7] As we pointed out in People v. Tuthill (1948) supra, 32 Cal.2d 819, 822 [2], "It is a general rule that…