From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 8, 2012
93 A.D.3d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-03-8

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mazghi SMITH, Appellant.

Carolyn B. George, Albany, for appellant. P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Steven M. Sharp of counsel), for respondent.


Carolyn B. George, Albany, for appellant. P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Steven M. Sharp of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, Acting P.J., Lahtinen, Spain, Stein and McCarthy, JJ.

McCARTHY, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Breslin, J.), rendered December 8, 2010, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the first degree.

Defendant was charged in a two-count indictment with robbery in the first degree and burglary in the first degree after he forced his way into the home of the nine-year-old victim's grandfather and proceeded to rob the boy of his videogame system at knife point. According to the victim's grandfather, when he tried to intervene, defendant knocked him down and fled the scene with the stolen property. Following defendant's arrest, a plea bargain was negotiated whereby he would plead guilty to robbery in the first degree in satisfaction of the indictment, waive his right to appeal and receive a sentence no greater than 2 to 6 years in prison. County Court informed defendant at that time that, while he was unwilling to grant him youthful offender status under the circumstances, he would duly consider any application that was made. Defendant then accepted the plea bargain, waived his right to appeal and pleaded guilty to robbery in the first degree in satisfaction of the indictment. At sentencing, the court, after denying defendant's application for youthful offender status, imposed a prison term of 1 2/3 to 5 years. This appeal ensued.

We affirm. Notably, defendant's appeal waiver, the validity of which he does not dispute ( see People v. French, 72 A.D.3d 1397, 1399, 898 N.Y.S.2d 896 [2010], lv. denied 15 N.Y.3d 804, 908 N.Y.S.2d 164, 934 N.E.2d 898 [2010] ), forecloses any review of the denial of defendant's request for youthful offender status ( see People v. Harrington, 281 A.D.2d 748, 748–749, 721 N.Y.S.2d 709 [2001], lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 830, 729 N.Y.S.2d 450, 754 N.E.2d 210 [2001] ).

MERCURE, Acting P.J., LAHTINEN, SPAIN and STEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 8, 2012
93 A.D.3d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mazghi SMITH…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 8, 2012

Citations

93 A.D.3d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 1700
939 N.Y.S.2d 719

Citing Cases

People v. Pacherille

This argument, however, is foreclosed by his valid waiver of the right to appeal, the enforceability of which…

People v. Jorge D.

The issue before us—one that has yet to be squarely resolved by this Court—distills to whether the sentencing…