From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 18, 2007
46 A.D.3d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-02488.

December 18, 2007.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated February 6, 2006, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant's sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki ( 3 F Supp 2d 456), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart of counsel), for respondent.

Before Crane, J.P., Rivera, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court's determination to designate him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus, should not be disturbed ( see Correction Law § 168-n; People v Morris, 33 AD3d 778; People v Robert L, 33 AD3d 777).


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 18, 2007
46 A.D.3d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DARRELL SMITH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 18, 2007

Citations

46 A.D.3d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 10130
847 N.Y.S.2d 465

Citing Cases

State v. Barry

The defendant was appropriately assessed points based on the victim's physical helplessness ( see People v…

People v. Hernandez

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Contrary to the defendant's contention,…