From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 2000
268 A.D.2d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued December 7, 1999

January 27, 2000

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LaTorella, J.), rendered June 12, 1997, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, possession of burglar's tools, and unlawful possession of a radio device, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N.Y. (David A. Crow of counsel; Evangeline M. Chan on the brief), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Robin A. Forshaw, and Nina M. Sas of counsel), for respondent.

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court providently exercised its discretion in sua sponte dismissing a prospective juror since the juror's responses to the court's own questions revealed that he was unqualified to serve ( see, People v. Zamora, 243 A.D.2d 746; People v. Mitchell, 224 A.D.2d 316).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, People v. Stewart, 81 N.Y.2d 877) and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

RITTER, J.P., ALTMAN, SCHMIDT, and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 2000
268 A.D.2d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. CHESTER SMITH, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 27, 2000

Citations

268 A.D.2d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
701 N.Y.S.2d 624

Citing Cases

People v. Laufer

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court improperly struck the only Jewish prospective juror from…