From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1996
234 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 30, 1996.

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Callahan, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


County Court properly denied the motion to suppress cocaine seized from defendant during a search undertaken by his parole officer with the assistance of a Syracuse police officer. The search, initiated by the parole officer based upon information that defendant was selling drugs and associating with drug dealers, was substantially related to the performance of the parole officer's duty to detect and prevent parole violations ( see, People v Huntley, 43 NY2d 175, 181). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J."Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.)


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1996
234 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GEORGE SMITH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
651 N.Y.S.2d 807

Citing Cases

People v. Wade

Rosa testified that the informant indicated that he or she had firsthand knowledge of the drug activity at…

People v. Taylor

After obtaining the requested information for the police officers, the parole officer informed the police…