From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smiley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 4, 2009
67 A.D.3d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Summary

noting that defendant's allegations "[we]re not supported by any other affidavit or evidence"

Summary of this case from Jenkins v. Greene

Opinion

No. 2008-02405.

November 4, 2009.

Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), dated January 22, 2008, which denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of the same court rendered November 3, 2000, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree (two counts), assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Warren S. Landau of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Gary Fidel and Edward D. Saslaw of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Florio, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erroneously denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate his judgment of conviction on the ground that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. In support of his CPL 440.10 motion, the defendant submitted his own affidavit wherein he alleged that trial counsel failed to inform him of the maximum sentence he faced in the event that he chose to reject a particular plea offer, and failed to recognize and advise him of the possibility that he could face consecutive sentences. The defendant claimed that had he known this information, he would not have rejected the plea offer. Since the defendant's self-serving allegations are not supported by any other affidavit or evidence, and under all the circumstances attending the case, there is no reasonable possibility that such allegations are true, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion without a hearing ( see CPL 440.30 [d]; see also People v Green, 200 AD2d 687; People v Pachay, 185 AD2d 287; cf. People v Mobley, 59 AD3d 741, 742).


Summaries of

People v. Smiley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 4, 2009
67 A.D.3d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

noting that defendant's allegations "[we]re not supported by any other affidavit or evidence"

Summary of this case from Jenkins v. Greene
Case details for

People v. Smiley

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD SMILEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 4, 2009

Citations

67 A.D.3d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 8046
886 N.Y.S.2d 893

Citing Cases

Jenkins v. Greene

Thus the court did not require an attorney affidavit as a prerequisite to reaching the merits, and, to the…

People v. Wong

Because the defendant's motion does not contain sworn allegations which substantiate that his attorney…