From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Skinner

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 11, 1979
48 N.Y.2d 889 (N.Y. 1979)

Opinion

Argued November 13, 1979

Decided December 11, 1979

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, HARRY DAVIS, J.

Robert S. Dean and William E. Hellerstein for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Frank Diaz and Brian Rosner of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order appealed from should be affirmed. The initial brief streetside interrogation of defendant was far less intrusive than is a traditional arrest, and thus need not have been supported by probable cause as long as the police had "a reasonable suspicion, based on objective facts, that the individual is involved in criminal activity" (Brown v Texas, 443 U.S. 47; see CPL 140.50; People v Moore, 47 N.Y.2d 911; cf. Dunaway v New York, 442 U.S. 200). We cannot say that the courts below erred as a matter of law in finding that the actions of the officers in this case were based on such a reasonable suspicion.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Skinner

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 11, 1979
48 N.Y.2d 889 (N.Y. 1979)
Case details for

People v. Skinner

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JERRY SKINNER…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 11, 1979

Citations

48 N.Y.2d 889 (N.Y. 1979)
424 N.Y.S.2d 884
400 N.E.2d 1336

Citing Cases

People v. Samuels

We disagree. Brown involved no more articulable reason to detain the person arrested than that his passing…

People v. Finlayson

Indeed, in cases decided after Dunaway, both the Supreme Court and our own Court of Appeals have recognized…