From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Singleton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 14, 1988
138 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

March 14, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dufficy, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15).

Furthermore, the trial court did not err in admitting the defendant's Grand Jury testimony into evidence on the People's direct case. The defendant's waiver of immunity before his appearance in the Grand Jury contemplated the utilization of his testimony in any later proceeding in which it became material (see, People v. Castillo, 3 A.D.2d 963; see also, United States v Grunewald, 164 F. Supp. 640; cf., People v. Batalias, 32 A.D.2d 1068, affd 27 N.Y.2d 958). Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Singleton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 14, 1988
138 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Singleton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THEODORE SINGLETON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 14, 1988

Citations

138 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Frumusa

Although the trial court was bound by the County Court's unsealing Order, it was still within the trial…

People v. Thomas

Party admissions constitute an exception to the hearsay rule ( see People v. Swart, 273 A.D.2d 503, 505, lv…