From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PEOPLE v. SIN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 28, 2000
278 A.D.2d 181 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

December 28, 2000.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.), rendered November 20, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the first degree and robbery in the second degree (two counts), and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 8 to 16 years, unanimously affirmed.

Barbara Jane Hutter, for respondent.

Lee B. Shelton Risa Gerson, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Tom, J.P., Ellerin, Rubin, Saxe, Buckley, JJ.


Defendant was not deprived of his right to effective assistance of counsel when the court denied his application to have his attorney's Mandarin-speaking assistant sit at the counsel table for the purpose of acting as an interpreter. Defendant was afforded unrestricted access to the official court interpreter and has made no showing of any need for a second interpreter (see, People v. Colon, 213 A.D.2d 490, lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 733; People v. Rodriguez, 165 A.D.2d 699, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 1024; People v. Marrero, 156 A.D.2d 141, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 921). Contrary to defendant's argument, attorney-client communications translated by an official court interpreter acting at the court's direction carry a reasonable expectation of confidentiality and are thus privileged (cf., People v. Osorio, 75 N.Y.2d 80, 84).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

PEOPLE v. SIN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 28, 2000
278 A.D.2d 181 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

PEOPLE v. SIN

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. YOUNG YEE SIN, A/K/A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 28, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 181 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 333

Citing Cases

SIN v. FISCHER

But the Appellate Division affirmed his conviction, noting that petitioner "was afforded unrestricted access…