From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Siegel

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 15, 2020
943 N.W.2d 91 (Mich. 2020)

Opinion

SC: 160153 COA: 348111

05-15-2020

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason Anthony SIEGEL, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 3, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of: (1) whether the defendant knew or had reason to know the video he posted on Facebook "could cause 2 or more separate noncontinuous acts of ‘unconsented contact’ with the victim," see MCL 750.411s(1)(a), see also MCL 750.411s(8)(j) (defining "unconsented contact"); Buchanan v. Crisler , 323 Mich. App. 163, 179-181, 922 N.W.2d 886 (2018) (providing examples of conduct typically supporting cyberstalking convictions under MCL 750.411s ); and (2) if the defendant did not know or have reason to know that posting the video could cause two or more separate "unconsented contacts" with the victim, whether the defendant can obtain relief under MCR 6.500, et seq . In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

People v. Siegel

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 15, 2020
943 N.W.2d 91 (Mich. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Siegel

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JASON ANTHONY…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: May 15, 2020

Citations

943 N.W.2d 91 (Mich. 2020)