From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sibila

County Court, Special Term, Nassau County
Feb 19, 1975
81 Misc. 2d 80 (N.Y. Cnty. Ct. 1975)

Opinion

February 19, 1975

James J. Mc Donough for defendant.

William Cahn, District Attorney, for plaintiff.


The defendant, through his attorney, moves for an order

(1) dismissing the indictment, and (2) for adjournment of trial on the grounds that the females were systematically excluded, in violation of due process as enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Taylor v Louisiana ( 419 U.S. 522).

Counsel stipulated that 54% of the eligible jurors in the county are women, that of the 70,000 jury notices for service mailed in 1974, 54% were sent to women, 70% of which claimed the female exemption provided for under subdivision 7 of section 665 Jud. of the Judiciary Law and that 60,000 names were in the Nassau County jury wheel in 1974, of which between 26% and 33% were women.

The contrast of between 26% to 33% women serving on juries in Nassau County when compared to the no more than 10% in St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana, constitutes a distinction constraining the court to deny in all respects the defendant's motions, because the defendant has failed to establish a systematic exclusion. (People v Anderson, 42 A.D.2d 1007.)


Summaries of

People v. Sibila

County Court, Special Term, Nassau County
Feb 19, 1975
81 Misc. 2d 80 (N.Y. Cnty. Ct. 1975)
Case details for

People v. Sibila

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM SIBILA…

Court:County Court, Special Term, Nassau County

Date published: Feb 19, 1975

Citations

81 Misc. 2d 80 (N.Y. Cnty. Ct. 1975)
365 N.Y.S.2d 133

Citing Cases

People v. Parks

Even granted the fact that women constitute a majority of the population in Nassau County and that a number,…

People v. Chesler

Significantly greater disparities than shown here between men and women in jury pools have most recently,…