From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Shukla, Flickinger, Hauer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 25, 1978
376 N.E.2d 1331 (N.Y. 1978)

Opinion

Argued March 23, 1978

Decided April 25, 1978

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JULIUS A. HELLENBRAND, J., EDWARD S. LENTOL, J.

Eugene Gold, District Attorney (Michael Gore of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Leonard R. Rosenblatt, Jules Ritholz and John J. Tigue, Jr., respondents-appellants.


MEMORANDUM.

On the appeal by the People, the order should be affirmed on the memorandum of the majority at the Appellate Division. We would also note that this protracted litigation could easily have been avoided if the prosecutor had simply sought permission to resubmit in accordance with the procedure expressly provided by law (CPL 210.20, subd 4).

The defendants' appeal should be dismissed. In view of the fact that they were the respondents in the Appellate Division and that court affirmed, the determination was not adverse to the defendants as is required by CPL 450.90 (subd 1).

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

On the People's appeal: Order affirmed.

On defendants' appeal: Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

People v. Shukla, Flickinger, Hauer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 25, 1978
376 N.E.2d 1331 (N.Y. 1978)
Case details for

People v. Shukla, Flickinger, Hauer

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant-Respondent, v. K.R. SHUKLA…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 25, 1978

Citations

376 N.E.2d 1331 (N.Y. 1978)
376 N.E.2d 1331
405 N.Y.S.2d 686

Citing Cases

People v. Sparber

The court should reject the People's request to remand appellant's case for resentencing because (a) the…

People v. Russo

After unsuccessfully seeking leave to appeal further the People moved before this court for the necessary…