acknowledging holding in Kobow but finding that under Minnesota statutes, sexual penetration is general intent crime, notwithstanding fact that sexual contact, specific intent crime, has been deemed lesser-included offense of sexual penetration
Summary of this case from State v. Schmidt1997. Pages 489 — 526
[EDITORS' NOTE: PAGES 489 — 526 CONTAINING PEOPLE v. SHORT HAVE BEEN OMITTED.]
Deleted on direction of Supreme Court by order dated May 21, 1997.
acknowledging holding in Kobow but finding that under Minnesota statutes, sexual penetration is general intent crime, notwithstanding fact that sexual contact, specific intent crime, has been deemed lesser-included offense of sexual penetration
Summary of this case from State v. SchmidtFull title:People v. Short
Court:Court of Appeal of California
Date published: Jan 1, 1997
Cf., State v. Malouin, 433 A.2d 176 (R.I. 1981) (second degree sexual assault, which requires proof of sexual…
Commonwealth of the N. Mariana Islands v. PalaciosSee Colorado In re JA., 733 P.2d 1197, 1199 (Colo. 1987) ( finding the term "sexual contact," which is…