From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Shaw

Michigan Court of Appeals
Mar 27, 1968
159 N.W.2d 350 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

Docket No. 2,481.

Decided March 27, 1968.

Appeal from Lenawee; Martin (Rex B.), J. Submitted Division 2 May 2, 1967, at Lansing. (Docket No. 2,481.) Decided March 27, 1968.

Damon Shaw was convicted of carnal knowledge of a female committed to a State institution. Affirmed.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Harvey A. Koselka, Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Russell Bird, for defendant.


This is an appeal from a conviction of a violation of CL 1948, § 750.341 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.573) which makes it a crime to carnally know a female patient in a State or county institution.

The only error asserted on appeal is that the verdict is against the great weight of the evidence.

Appellant argues that the complaining witness testified in a contradictory and conflicting manner and that such testimony should not serve to support a conviction.

The rule on review is that if there is evidence in the record which, if believed, will support a verdict of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt we will not reverse. People v. Williams (1962), 368 Mich. 494, 501.

We have examined the record carefully, and despite some questionable cross-examination by the prosecutor of his main witness, we have discovered no reversible error. We are satisfied that the defendant had a fair trial.

Affirmed.

LEVIN and SULLIVAN, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

People v. Shaw

Michigan Court of Appeals
Mar 27, 1968
159 N.W.2d 350 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

People v. Shaw

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. SHAW

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 27, 1968

Citations

159 N.W.2d 350 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968)
159 N.W.2d 350

Citing Cases

People v. Merritt

The evidence was adequate to support the verdict of guilty. This Court will not disturb a guilty verdict by a…

People v. Gray

An appellate court cannot and will not interfere with any factual determination made by a jury and supported…