From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Shaunding

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 2, 1934
268 Mich. 218 (Mich. 1934)

Opinion

Docket No. 113, Calendar No. 37,786.

Submitted June 14, 1934.

Decided July 2, 1934.

Appeal from Allegan; Miles (Fred T.), J. Submitted June 14, 1934. (Docket No. 113, Calendar No. 37,786.) Decided July 2, 1934.

Brenton Shaunding was convicted of entering a horse shed, without breaking, with intent to commit larceny therein. Reversed, and new trial granted.

Clare E. Hoffman ( Leo W. Hoffman and Carl E. Hoffman, of counsel), for appellant.

Patrick H. O'Brien, Attorney General, and Welbourne S. Luna, Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.


The trial court was in error in excluding testimony offered by the respondent as to his belief that he had the right to take the property in question from the place from which it was taken.

"The felonious intent is an essential and inseparable ingredient in every larceny, and if a person takes property under a claim of right, however unfounded, he has not committed larceny." People v. Hillhouse, 80 Mich. 580, 586.

The judgment is reversed, and a new trial is granted.

NELSON SHARPE, C.J., and POTTER, NORTH, FEAD, WIEST, BUTZEL, and EDWARD M. SHARPE, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

People v. Shaunding

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 2, 1934
268 Mich. 218 (Mich. 1934)
Case details for

People v. Shaunding

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. SHAUNDING

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jul 2, 1934

Citations

268 Mich. 218 (Mich. 1934)
255 N.W. 770

Citing Cases

United States v. One 1941 Chrysler Brougham Sedan

The cited larceny statute is therefore inapplicable. People v. Shaunding, 268 Mich. 218, 219, 255 N.W. 770.…

State v. Noe

State v. Childress, 78 Ariz. 1, 274 P.2d 333, 46 A.L.R.2d 1169. While, under the circumstances, consent of…