From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Scanlon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 31, 1963
194 N.E.2d 689 (N.Y. 1963)

Opinion

Argued October 1, 1963

Decided October 31, 1963

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, THOMAS E. MORRISSEY, JR., J.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Daniel M. Cohen and Paxton Blair of counsel), for appellant.

Raymond J. McGrover for respondent.


Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Special Term with instructions to dismiss defendant's application to modify the injunction and his motion to set aside the subpoena upon the ground that the issues are moot (1) because defendant desires to withdraw his application to modify the 1939 injunction; and (2) because the issuance of such a subpoena as is here attacked is now authorized by new subdivision 4 of section 359-g of the General Business Law. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, FOSTER and SCILEPPI.


Summaries of

People v. Scanlon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 31, 1963
194 N.E.2d 689 (N.Y. 1963)
Case details for

People v. Scanlon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. GEORGE F. SCANLON…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 31, 1963

Citations

194 N.E.2d 689 (N.Y. 1963)
194 N.E.2d 689
244 N.Y.S.2d 781

Citing Cases

Siegel v. Siegel

This would effectively undermine the finality of judgments in matrimonial actions due to changes in the value…

O'Brien v. O'Brien

I concur in Judge Simons' opinion but write separately to point up for consideration by the Legislature the…