From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santiago

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 3, 1964
15 N.Y.2d 640 (N.Y. 1964)

Opinion

Argued November 30, 1964

Decided December 3, 1964

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOHN R. STARKEY, J.

Monroe Goldwater, Anthony F. Marra and Grace L. Brodsky for appellant.

Aaron E. Koota, District Attorney ( Frank Di Lalla of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered on the ground that prejudicial error was committed when the prosecutor on cross-examination questioned defendant about a criminal charge on which he had been acquitted ( People v. Cascone, 185 N.Y. 317, 334; People v. Savvides, 1 N.Y.2d 554).

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

People v. Santiago

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 3, 1964
15 N.Y.2d 640 (N.Y. 1964)
Case details for

People v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JUAN SANTIAGO…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 3, 1964

Citations

15 N.Y.2d 640 (N.Y. 1964)

Citing Cases

Ward v. Thistleton

The findings of fact below are affirmed. In our opinion, the cross-examination of plaintiff Willie Ward with…

People v. Whitmoyer

No questions of fact were considered. In our opinion, during defendant's cross-examination, the form of the…