From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 16, 2001
279 A.D.2d 324 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

January 16, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obus, J.), rendered February 17, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 15 years to life and 5 to 15 years, unanimously affirmed.


The existing record establishes that defendant received meaningful representation ( see, People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714) and shows that counsel's strategic decisions with regard to the making of motions to suppress, or to preclude for lack of notice, certain identification testimony by police officers were appropriate. In any event, defendant received a full hearing regarding identification evidence and there is no indication that defense counsel would have obtained suppression or preclusion of any evidence had his strategy been different.

The undercover officer's brief reference to his own lineup identification of another perpetrator did not cause any prejudice ( see, People v. Calber, 227 A.D.2d 172, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 920).


Summaries of

People v. Santana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 16, 2001
279 A.D.2d 324 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Santana

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE SANTANA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 16, 2001

Citations

279 A.D.2d 324 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
718 N.Y.S.2d 848

Citing Cases

Santana v. Commissioner of Correctional Services

In any event, defendant received a full hearing regarding identification evidence and there is no indication…