From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Russo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 27, 1978
61 A.D.2d 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

March 27, 1978


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered September 29, 1976, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. This appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of the defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Judgment affirmed. The motion to withdraw the plea was made on the grounds of (1) defendant's intoxication at the time he entered the plea and (2) misinformation by counsel as to the minimum period of incarceration should defendant be found guilty as charged. At the hearing defendant did not dispute his admission at the plea that he received $50 from the proceeds of a $1,300 sale of cocaine. Nowhere in the record does the defendant protest his innocence. We cannot hold, on this record, that the denial of the motion to withdraw the guilty plea was an improvident exercise of discretion. We have examined defendant's constitutional claim relating to the severity of his sentence and find it to be without merit. Hopkins, J.P., Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Russo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 27, 1978
61 A.D.2d 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

People v. Russo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BRUCE RUSSO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 27, 1978

Citations

61 A.D.2d 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

People v. Robinson

Judgment affirmed. The denial of defendant's motion to withdraw his plea was not an improvident exercise of…

People v. Ehlers

In the absence of any claim of innocence, fraud, coercion, mistake or any other good reason advanced to…