From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rushings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 5, 1990
159 A.D.2d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

March 5, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

After receiving a report of a rape in progress, Police Officers Shanahan and Tossner responded to a Queens apartment where they found the defendant and the complainant dressed only in their undergarments. The complainant immediately indicated to Officer Shanahan that the defendant had raped her. Shortly thereafter, a female officer arrived on the scene and further discussed the incident with the complainant. At trial, Officer Shanahan was the only police witness to testify for the People.

The defendant contends that the court erred in refusing to give a missing witness charge in regard to Officer Tossner and the female officer. We disagree. There is no indication in this record that either of these officers would have provided material and noncumulative testimony (see, People v Gonzalez, 68 N.Y.2d 424).

We also find no merit in the defendant's contention that his right to a jury trial was violated when the trial court employed an alternate to replace a juror who had become ill. Such a decision was proper under CPL 270.35, following adequate inquiry by the court (see, People v Page, 72 N.Y.2d 69).

However, as conceded by the People, the defendant's conviction of unlawful imprisonment in the second degree should be vacated under the doctrine of merger. Under the circumstances, that crime was merged into the crime of rape in the first degree with which the defendant was charged and convicted (see, People v Geaslen, 54 N.Y.2d 510).

We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Lawrence, J.P., Rubin, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rushings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 5, 1990
159 A.D.2d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Rushings

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JARRIE RUSHINGS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 5, 1990

Citations

159 A.D.2d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
552 N.Y.S.2d 653

Citing Cases

People v. John

More recently, in People v. McDonald ( 143 A.D.2d 1050), the clerk of the court received a phone call from…

People v. Gonzalez

After People v Levy ( 15 N.Y.2d 159, cert denied 381 U.S. 938, supra) was decided, a number of cases were…