From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rowland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 28, 2004
11 A.D.3d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

15206

October 28, 2004.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano, Jr., J.) rendered January 12, 2004, which revoked defendant's probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur.


Defendant waived indictment and agreed to be prosecuted by a superior court information charging him with attempted criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree. He pleaded guilty to the charge and was sentenced, among other things, to five years' probation. As part of the plea, he also waived his right to appeal. Thereafter, defendant was charged with violating the terms of his probation by failing to report to his probation officer as required. He was found guilty of the charge following a hearing and his probation was revoked. He was then resentenced to 1 to 3 years in prison.

Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the sentence imposed for the underlying crime following the revocation of his probation is harsh and excessive. Preliminarily, we note that defendant's original waiver of appeal does not preclude him from raising this issue as it concerns the resentencing ( see People v. Cheatham, 278 AD2d 889; People v. Rodriguez, 259 AD2d 1040). Upon reviewing the record, we find no abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of his sentence in the interest of justice. Defendant exhibited a total disregard for the requirement that he report to his probation officer by failing to do so on numerous occasions between June 2002 and June 2003. With these facts and defendant's criminal history, we find no reason to disturb the sentence ( see People v. Barkley, 289 AD2d 880; People v. Langlois, 243 AD2d 775, lv denied 92 NY2d 855).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Rowland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 28, 2004
11 A.D.3d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Rowland

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN N. ROWLAND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 28, 2004

Citations

11 A.D.3d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
783 N.Y.S.2d 316

Citing Cases

People v. Warriner

Defendant argues that an updated presentence investigation report should have been obtained and asserts that…

People v. Venable

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are…