From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rosner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 14, 1992
185 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

July 14, 1992

Appeal from the Genesee County Court, Morton, J.

Present — Boomer, J.P., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant's contention that the court erred in ordering a joint trial with separate juries rather than separate trials. Defendant's primary argument is that the court, by failing to direct separate trials, effectively deprived him of the benefit of a plea offer that would have resulted in a sentence of 20 years to life rather than the 25 years to life he received. The plea offer was part of a plea negotiation; it was not available unless accepted by both defendants. The codefendant chose to proceed to trial and the plea offer was withdrawn. Defendant had a right to plead to the full indictment (see, People v. Bradley, [appeal No. 1], 184 A.D.2d 1041; CPL 220.10), but not to anything less without the consent of the People (see, CPL 220.10, [3]).

We have reviewed the other contentions raised by defendant and find that they were unpreserved or without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Rosner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 14, 1992
185 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Rosner

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSHUA ROSNER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 14, 1992

Citations

185 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Cahill

See Matter of Hynes v. Tomei ( 92 NY2d 613 [1998]). See People v. Machare ( 264 AD2d 487 [2d Dept 1999], lv…

People v. Antoine

The law is well-settled that a defendant does not have the right to plead guilty to a lesser included offense…