From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Roshia

Court of Appeals of New York.
Oct 20, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6859 (N.Y. 2016)

Opinion

10-20-2016

The PEOPLE & c., Respondent, v. James M. ROSHIA, Jr. Appellant.

Albert F. Lawrence, Greenfield Center, for appellant. Alexander Lesyk, Special Prosecutor, Norwood, for respondent.


Albert F. Lawrence, Greenfield Center, for appellant.

Alexander Lesyk, Special Prosecutor, Norwood, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant was indicted by a grand jury, a sexual assault evidence kit was taken from the victim, and County Court's order directing defendant to provide a DNA sample was authorized by statute (CPL 240.40[2][b][v] ). Accordingly, County Court did not err in granting the People's application directing defendant to provide a buccal swab for testing.

Chief Judge DiFIORE and Judges PIGOTT, RIVERA, ABDUS–SALAAM, STEIN, FAHEY and GARCIA concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 ), order affirmed, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Roshia

Court of Appeals of New York.
Oct 20, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6859 (N.Y. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Roshia

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE & c., Respondent, v. James M. ROSHIA, Jr. Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Oct 20, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6859 (N.Y. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6859
41 N.Y.S.3d 208
63 N.E.3d 1152

Citing Cases

People v. Watkins

We also find that County Court properly granted the People's application to obtain a buccal swab sample from…

People v. Tadd

He now appeals. Initially, the People concede, and we agree, that defendant's waiver of appeal was invalid…