From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 5, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Braun, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the court erred in denying his application to withdraw his plea of guilty without first appointing new counsel and holding a hearing is without merit. The decision whether to permit a defendant to withdraw a previously-entered plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the sentencing court ( see, People v. McDowell, 198 A.D.2d 236). The minutes of the plea proceedings show that the defendant entered a knowing and voluntary Alford plea ( see, North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25), and completely refute the claims he made at sentencing. The defendant's unhappiness with the agreement will not justify withdrawal of the plea ( see, People v Leggett, 163 A.D.2d 862). In the absence of anything in the record to suggest that the defendant's plea was either improvident or baseless, his assertions of innocence and that he was ill-advised are insufficient to warrant withdrawal of the plea ( see, People v. Bourdonnay, 160 A.D.2d 1014).

The defendant voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his right to appeal the judgment of conviction ( see, People v. Holman, 89 N.Y.2d 876; People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273; People v. Moissett, 76 N.Y.2d 909; People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1).

Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Rosa

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ISRAEL ROSA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 5, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 94

Citing Cases

People v. Yurkovsky

Upon the foregoing, the within motion would normally be summarily denied. CPL § 220.60(3): People v Hansen,…

People v. Williams

Nothing in the record demonstrates Defendant's plea was improvident. Accordingly, and based upon the…