From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rontey

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 22, 1889
22 N.E. 1128 (N.Y. 1889)

Summary

In People v. Rontey (4 N.Y. Supp. 235; affirmed on opinion below, 117 N.Y. 624) the defendant was convicted for having unlawfully conducted a pharmacy in the city of New York, not being a registered pharmacist as required by the New York City Consolidation Act of 1882.

Summary of this case from State Board of Pharmacy v. Matthews

Opinion

Argued October 8, 1889

Decided October 22, 1889

L.B. Treadwell for appellant.

McKenzie Semple for respondent.


Agree to affirm on opinion below.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Rontey

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 22, 1889
22 N.E. 1128 (N.Y. 1889)

In People v. Rontey (4 N.Y. Supp. 235; affirmed on opinion below, 117 N.Y. 624) the defendant was convicted for having unlawfully conducted a pharmacy in the city of New York, not being a registered pharmacist as required by the New York City Consolidation Act of 1882.

Summary of this case from State Board of Pharmacy v. Matthews
Case details for

People v. Rontey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . ABEL M. RONTEY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 22, 1889

Citations

22 N.E. 1128 (N.Y. 1889)
22 N.E. 1128
26 N.Y. St. Rptr. 979

Citing Cases

Suffolk County v. Shaw

The defendant gave no proof upon the subject, beyond his own declaration, made upon the other trial. The…

State Board of Pharmacy v. Matthews

While the constitutional validity of a statute regulating and restricting the sale of drugs and medicines…