From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1990
167 A.D.2d 120 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 1, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anthony Brandveen, J.).


Defendant was arrested as a result of a "buy-and-bust" operation. The undercover narcotics officer testified that she purchased two vials of crack cocaine from defendant in the vestibule of 2726 Decatur Avenue. Defendant never denied the exchange but asserted that he was merely acting as the officer's agent, a defense which the jury rejected.

The prosecutor's unsuccessful attempt during cross-examination to make defendant characterize the undercover officer as a liar was improper, but does not, standing alone, warrant reversal (People v. Hudson, 104 A.D.2d 157) and, in any event, must be deemed harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt. (People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 243.) Defendant's claims with respect to the prosecutor's summation were not preserved for appellate review, and we decline to reach them in the interest of justice.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1990
167 A.D.2d 120 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 120 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
561 N.Y.S.2d 208

Citing Cases

People v. Railey

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Haft, J.). While the prosecutor's cross-examination of…