From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 1, 1994
207 A.D.2d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

September 1, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Arlene Silverman, J.).


It was a permissible intrusion for the officers to have approached the defendant to ask him general questions, based upon their founded suspicion that criminality was afoot, derived from the defendant's actions of (1) changing his pace upon noticing the police, (2) attempting to hide the bag he was carrying from the officers' view, (3) continually looking over his shoulder, and (4) entering a vestibule and banging his hand on the buzzer panel to gain entry. "Although each factor, standing alone, could be susceptible to an innocent interpretation, a view of the entire circumstances" gave the officers a founded suspicion that criminality was afoot, such to invoke their common law right to inquire (People v. Evans, 65 N.Y.2d 629, 630).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Ross, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 1, 1994
207 A.D.2d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 31

Citing Cases

People v. Velasquez

The police officers observed two men running in a deserted area with no traffic or other pedestrians shortly…

People v. Ramirez

Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The record supports the hearing court's determination…