From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1995
221 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 15, 1995

Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Motion to expand the judgment roll and for permission to file and serve a pro se supplemental brief denied. Memorandum: Issues raised on direct appeal must be a matter of record. If there is a dispute concerning the contents of the record, a motion to settle the record before the trial court ( see, 22 NYCRR 1000.5 [g] [2]) must be made. A defendant who seeks to raise an issue that is outside the record must raise it within the context of a CPL 440.10 motion to vacate the judgment. Defendant's motion to file a pro se supplemental brief is premature because defendant's assigned counsel has not filed and served the principal brief in this appeal ( see, 22 NYCRR 1000.5 [g] [1]).


Summaries of

People v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1995
221 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE, Respondent, v. PATRICE ROBINSON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
634 N.Y.S.2d 583

Citing Cases

People v. Woods

We decline to exercise our power to review those contentions as a matter of discretion in the interest of…

People v. Smith

This hearing followed, over the defendant's objection. The People characterize this proceeding as a motion to…