Opinion
June 15, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the trial court's response to the jury's request for a readback of certain portions of a witness's testimony was insufficient and deprived him of a fair trial. Contrary to the defendant's contention, we find that the court properly gave the jury the information it requested (see, CPL 310.30).
We have examined the defendant's contentions regarding the jury charge and find that they are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05), and, in any event, without merit (see, People v. Canty, 60 N.Y.2d 830, 832).
The sentence imposed upon the defendant was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Thompson, J.P., Bracken, O'Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.