From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Roberson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 3, 1990
160 A.D.2d 200 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

April 3, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (David H. Edwards, Jr., J.).


Defendant challenged the prosecutor's predicate violent felony statement on the ground, inter alia, that his prior plea of guilty was unknowingly and involuntarily made. After a review of the plea proceeding minutes of the earlier felony conviction, the sentencing court denied that challenge without a hearing on the basis that the record failed to support defendant's assertion. Although a defendant is ordinarily entitled to a hearing to test the constitutionality of a predicate felony conviction, a hearing is not required if submitted records establish the constitutionality of the conviction (People v. Stewart, 96 A.D.2d 622, 623). Once the prior conviction has been established, it is incumbent upon the defendant to prove the facts underlying the claim that the conviction was unconstitutionally obtained (People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 15). The defendant did not meet this burden, and indeed, the record of the prior proceeding contradicted the claim.

We have examined defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Roberson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 3, 1990
160 A.D.2d 200 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Roberson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KENNETH ROBERSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1990

Citations

160 A.D.2d 200 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
554 N.Y.S.2d 6

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

Defendant did not substantiate his claim that he received ineffective assistance in connection with the…

People v. Paul

The court's charge on reasonable doubt adequately conveyed to the jury the proper standard (see, People v.…