From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 9, 2003
2 A.D.3d 175 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2424.

Decided December 9, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Drager, J. at hearing; Rena Uviller, J. at plea and sentence), rendered February 14, 2001, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Madeleine Guilmain, for Respondent.

Paul Wiener, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Saxe, Williams, Gonzalez, JJ.


The court correctly denied defendant's suppression motion. The police properly stopped defendant's vehicle because he committed a traffic violation by driving with his headlights off ( see People v. Robinson, 97 N.Y.2d 341), and the ensuing police conduct was entirely lawful. The record does not support defendant's assertion that his traffic violation was the product of police action in creating an allegedly unconstitutional taxi checkpoint. Accordingly, we need not decide the legality of the checkpoint. In any event, were we to reach defendant's challenges to the checkpoint, we would reject them.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 9, 2003
2 A.D.3d 175 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Richardson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEHU RICHARDSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 9, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 175 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
768 N.Y.S.2d 462

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

These findings by the hearing court are supported by the record and therefore should not be disturbed on…

People v. Williams

Were we to review this claim, we would find that the Court was entitled to take judicial notice of the speed…