From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Restrepo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 17, 1990
165 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

September 17, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.).


Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

A fair reading of the sentence minutes does not support the defendant's contention that the sentencing court improperly took into consideration a charge of which the defendant had been acquitted in imposing sentence (cf., People v. Villanueva, 144 A.D.2d 285; People v. Coward, 100 A.D.2d 628). Moreover, we conclude that the sentence imposed was not unduly harsh or excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Thompson, J.P., Brown, Balletta and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Restrepo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 17, 1990
165 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Restrepo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RUBEN RESTREPO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 17, 1990

Citations

165 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

People v. McGrath

In any event, the comments made by the prosecutor during summation were either fair comment on the evidence,…

People v. Dyson

The defendant's contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel based on the defense…