From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rees

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 11, 2010
74 A.D.3d 1815 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. KA 09-00583.

June 11, 2010.

Appeal from a resentence of the Cattaraugus County Court (Larry M. Himelein, J.), rendered March 2, 2009. Defendant was resentenced upon his conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree.

JAMES L. DOWSEY, III, WEST VALLEY, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LORI PETTIT RIEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LITTLE VALLEY (KELLY M. BALCOM OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey Carni, Green and Gorski, JJ.

It is hereby ordered that the resentence so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law, the original sentence is reinstated and the matter is remitted to Cattaraugus County Court for proceedings pursuant to CPL 470.45.


Memorandum:

County Court erred in resentencing defendant to a period of postrelease supervision after defendant had been conditionally released from the previously imposed determinate sentence of incarceration and the maximum expiration date of that sentence had passed ( see People v Williams, 14 NY3d 198, 217-220; People v Peterkin, 71 AD3d 1402). We therefore conclude that reversal is required.


Summaries of

People v. Rees

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 11, 2010
74 A.D.3d 1815 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Rees

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SHAWN REES, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 11, 2010

Citations

74 A.D.3d 1815 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 5129
902 N.Y.S.2d 488

Citing Cases

People v. Nunes

The Double Jeopardy Clause prohibits the imposition of a period of postrelease supervision at resentencing if…