From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Reed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 2004
6 A.D.3d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2000-02238.

Decided April 12, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), rendered February 10, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Matthew Muraskin, Melville, N.Y., for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Douglas A. Spencer of counsel), for respondent.

Before: NANCY E. SMITH, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, THOMAS A. ADAMS, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not made knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily because the County Court failed to advise him that he would be subjected to five years of post-release supervision, is unpreserved for appellate review ( see People v. Concepcion, 2 A.D.3d 873; People v. Chapman, 2 A.D.3d 647, lv denied 1 N.Y.3d 596; People v. Mapp, 308 A.D.2d 462, lv denied 1 N.Y.3d 575; People v. Folks, 306 A.D.2d 355; People v. Higgins, 304 A.D.2d 773).

There is no merit to the contention that the failure of the defendant's attorney to attempt to negotiate a shorter term of post-release supervision constituted ineffective assistance of counsel, since the five-year period imposed is mandatory for second violent felony offenders such as the defendant ( see Penal Law § 70.45.

SMITH, J.P., LUCIANO, ADAMS and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Reed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 2004
6 A.D.3d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. WILLIAM REED, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 12, 2004

Citations

6 A.D.3d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
774 N.Y.S.2d 388

Citing Cases

People v. Jiggetts

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. The defendant's contention that he was not adequately advised that he…

People v. Gregory

The defendant contends that his plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered because he was…