Opinion
December 4, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Koch, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
As correctly conceded by the People, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree is a lesser-included offense of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and, under the circumstances, the former count should have been dismissed pursuant to CPL 300.40 (3) (b) (see, People v Brown, 198 A.D.2d 291; People v Gay, 190 A.D.2d 861). However, possession offenses related to controlled substances are not lesser-included offenses of those crimes prohibiting their sale. Therefore, the defendant's conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree is not a lesser-included offense of criminal sale of controlled substance in the third degree subject to dismissal pursuant to CPL 300.40 (3) (b) (see, People v Byrd, 214 A.D.2d 581; People v Simms, 176 A.D.2d 833; People v Burton, 104 A.D.2d 655; People v Teixeira, 101 A.D.2d 818).
The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Sullivan, J.P., Thompson, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.