From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Randolph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 8, 1993
195 A.D.2d 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

July 8, 1993

Appeal from the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.).


Defendant was originally sentenced to six months in jail and five years' probation following his conviction of forgery in the second degree. Defendant was subsequently found to have violated the terms of his probation and upon the revocation of his probation was sentenced to 2 1/3 to 7 years' imprisonment. On this appeal, defendant contends that a laboratory test result introduced to establish that defendant had violated his probation by testing positive for cocaine was erroneously introduced into evidence at the revocation hearing.

Hearsay evidence, while admissible if relevant, is insufficient in itself to support a finding of probation violation (see, People v. Raleigh, 184 A.D.2d 869, lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 908). Here, the evidence admitted to support the charge that defendant had tested positive for cocaine use was the laboratory test results and the testimony of defendant's probation officer that the results were positive, both of which are inadmissible hearsay absent a sufficient foundation establishing a business record exception to the hearsay rule (see, People ex rel. Saafir v Mantello, 163 A.D.2d 824). As no such foundation is evident in the record before this Court, the People have failed to meet their burden as to this charge. Defendant does not challenge the findings of probation violation in failing to keep appointments or to notify the Probation Department of his arrest and conviction for criminal use of drug paraphernalia in the first degree and refusing to cooperate with his probation officer. Given that we find insufficient evidence to support County Court's finding that defendant violated his probation by using cocaine, however, we vacate the sentence and remit for resentencing based upon the remaining violation findings (see, People v Britton, 158 A.D.2d 932, lv dismissed 76 N.Y.2d 785).

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reversing so much thereof as found that defendant had violated the term of probation prohibiting him from using illegal substances and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment; matter remitted to the County Court of Ulster County for resentencing; and, as so modified, affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Randolph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 8, 1993
195 A.D.2d 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Randolph

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILBERT J. RANDOLPH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1993

Citations

195 A.D.2d 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
600 N.Y.S.2d 331

Citing Cases

People v. Spragis

While we agree with defendant that the evidence of his use of marihuana included hearsay, we cannot agree…

People v. Robinson

Nevertheless, defendant does not challenge on appeal the court's further findings that he engaged in other…