From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ramos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1985
110 A.D.2d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

April 22, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Balbach, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Even if it was error for the court not to have charged the jury on criminal trespass in the third degree as a lesser included offense of burglary in the second degree or burglary in the third degree, as requested by counsel, the error was harmless under the circumstances, since the jury was instructed as to criminal trespass in the second degree and rejected that lesser included offense ( see, People v. Richette, 33 N.Y.2d 42).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J.P., O'Connor, Weinstein and Brown, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ramos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1985
110 A.D.2d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Ramos

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RENE RAMOS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1985

Citations

110 A.D.2d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Morales

Burglary in the third degree (building) [Penal Law § 140.20] is clearly a lesser included offense of burglary…

People v. Cekja

There was no reasonable view of the evidence which would have allowed the jury to conclude that the defendant…