Summary
In People v. Pugach (16 N.Y.2d 504, app. dsmd. Pugach v. New York, 383 U.S. 575) the eavesdropping by police based on a judicial order and affidavit rather similar to that in the present case played a small part in an overwhelmingly strong record which contained many other similar admissions made by the defendant.
Summary of this case from People v. McCallOpinion
Submitted January 14, 1965
Decided April 22, 1965
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, JOSEPH A. MARTINIS, J.
Burton N. Pugach, appellant pro se. Isidore Dollinger, District Attorney ( Bertram R. Gelfand of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment affirmed; no opinion.
Motion denied.
Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.