From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Primmer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 3, 1979
389 N.E.2d 1070 (N.Y. 1979)

Opinion

Argued March 21, 1979

Decided April 3, 1979

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, JOHN G. DIER, J.

Jack R. Lebowitz for appellant.

Daniel T. Smith, District Attorney, for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant claims that he was denied his right to a speedy trial as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution in that he was not afforded a speedy trial within 180 days of his notification to the District Attorney that he was imprisoned in Texas (CPL 580.20). It is conceded, however, that he first raised his alleged deprivation at the Appellate Division; "and, not having raised the issue in the court of first instance, there is no error to be reviewed" (People v Adams, 38 N.Y.2d 605, 607; see, also, People v Adams, 46 N.Y.2d 1047 [decided herewith]). In view of this disposition we do not reach or consider the merits of the issue tendered by defendant.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Primmer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 3, 1979
389 N.E.2d 1070 (N.Y. 1979)
Case details for

People v. Primmer

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LYNN J. PRIMMER, Also…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 3, 1979

Citations

389 N.E.2d 1070 (N.Y. 1979)
389 N.E.2d 1070
416 N.Y.S.2d 548

Citing Cases

Williams v. Dalsheim

" County Court of Ulster County v. Allen, 442 U.S. 140, 151 n. 10, 99 S.Ct. 2213, 2221, 60 L.Ed.2d 777…

People v. Zambito

Neither do we find merit in defendant's contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that his right to a…