From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Prihett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 16, 2001
279 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

January 16, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered May 19, 1998, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4½ to 9 years, and imposing the mandatory surcharge, unanimously affirmed.


Defendant's claim that the court's imposition of the mandatory surcharge (Penal Law § 60.35) without mentioning such surcharge during the plea colloquy constituted a violation of his plea bargain is unpreserved as a result of defendant's failure to move to withdraw his plea on this ground or to object to the surcharge, and we decline to review this claim in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find no indication in the record that defendant's guilty plea was made in reliance on a promise that the surcharge would not be imposed. We also note that the surcharge, unlike a fine, is mandatory (CPL 420.35). We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claims.


Summaries of

People v. Prihett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 16, 2001
279 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Prihett

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DWAYNE PRIHETT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 16, 2001

Citations

279 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
718 N.Y.S.2d 840

Citing Cases

People v. Swart

In any event, were we to reach defendant's argument regarding the surcharge, we would find it without merit.…

People v. Neu

Although not part of the agreed-upon sentence, County Court further ordered defendant to pay restitution in…