Opinion
July 9, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, (Teresi, J.).
Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of attempted burglary in the second degree in satisfaction of a multicount indictment and was sentenced as a second felony offender to consecutive prison terms of 2 1/2 to 5 years. Inasmuch as defendant waived his right to appeal as part of his voluntary guilty plea, his contention that the sentences were harsh and excessive are unpreserved for our review ( see, People v. Moneyhan, 248 A.D.2d 756). Nevertheless, were we to consider this assertion, we would find it to be without merit. In view of the fact that the agreed-upon sentences significantly reduced defendant's potential sentence exposure if convicted of all charges in the indictment, together with defendant's extensive criminal history, we would find that the sentences imposed were neither harsh nor excessive and would find no extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentences in the interest of justice ( see, People v. Spanos, 224 A.D.2d 732, 733; People v. Smith, 207 A.D.2d 926, 927, lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 1039).
Mikoll, J.P., White, Peters, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.