From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pluff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1977
58 A.D.2d 1023 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

July 12, 1977

Appeal from the Onondaga Supreme Court.

Present — Cardamone, J.P., Simons, Hancock, Denman and Witmer, JJ.


Judgment, insofar as it imposes sentence, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion, in the interest of justice, to an indeterminate sentence having a minimum of three years and a maximum of six years, and otherwise, judgment affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of unlawfully selling .81 ounces of marijuana in violation of section 220.34 (subd 1, par [c]) of the Penal Law, a class C felony and sentenced as a second felony offender to an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment having a minimum term of four years and a maximum term of eight years. Prior to the trial he had withdrawn his earlier guilty plea to a reduced attempted possession charge, a class E felony, which the court had accepted with an indication that the minimum sentence allowable under section 70.06 Penal of the Penal Law would be imposed (an indeterminate sentence having a minimum of one and one-half years and a maximum of three years). Under all the circumstances, the sentence should be reduced in the interest of justice to the minimum permitted for a class C felony conviction under section 70.06 Penal of the Penal Law (an indeterminate sentence having a minimum of three years and a maximum of six years).


Summaries of

People v. Pluff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1977
58 A.D.2d 1023 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

People v. Pluff

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DONALD E. PLUFF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1977

Citations

58 A.D.2d 1023 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

People C. v. Balio, et al.

In doubling the plea offer at sentence, an inference arises that the County Court punished appellant for…

People v. Diaz

In this regard, the Appellate Division, Second Department, has stated: "The fact that appellant proceeded to…