From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pizarro

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 11, 1965
205 N.E.2d 695 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Argued January 13, 1965

Decided February 11, 1965

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, HENRY TASKER, J.

Manuel Nelson Zapata for appellant.

Bernard C. Smith, District Attorney ( Charles T. Matthews of counsel), for respondent.


The judgment of conviction is reversed and a new trial ordered on account of the reception in evidence of an admission against interest made by appellant after indictment and while in jail ( People v. Meyer, 11 N.Y.2d 162; People v. Di Biasi, 7 N.Y.2d 544). Upon the new trial, the Grand Jury minutes of testimony by the People's witnesses who testify at the trial should be exhibited to defendant's counsel ( People v. Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286).

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

People v. Pizarro

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 11, 1965
205 N.E.2d 695 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

People v. Pizarro

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GEORGE PIZARRO…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 11, 1965

Citations

205 N.E.2d 695 (N.Y. 1965)
205 N.E.2d 695
257 N.Y.S.2d 600

Citing Cases

People v. Bartholomew

Although the United States Supreme Court has held that the defendant's constitutional right to obtain…

People v. Seeley

Because of this, a FOIL requester is entitled to receive documents that an ordinary litigant would not…