From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Picking, Picking

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 28, 1942
42 N.E.2d 741 (N.Y. 1942)

Summary

In People v. Picking (288 N.Y. 644), we sustained a conviction under subdivision 16 for exploitation of the American flag in commercial advertising (see, also, Halter v. Nebraska, 205 U.S. 34, supra) and other jurisdictions have, on occasion, similarly punished such disrespectful conduct as publicly tearing a flag or throwing it to the ground.

Summary of this case from People v. Street

Opinion

Argued April 30, 1942

Decided May 28, 1942

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, KOZICKE, J.

Ida M. Picking, in person, for appellants.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( Francis C. Leffler and Stanley H. Fuld of counsel), for respondent.


Judgments affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Picking, Picking

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 28, 1942
42 N.E.2d 741 (N.Y. 1942)

In People v. Picking (288 N.Y. 644), we sustained a conviction under subdivision 16 for exploitation of the American flag in commercial advertising (see, also, Halter v. Nebraska, 205 U.S. 34, supra) and other jurisdictions have, on occasion, similarly punished such disrespectful conduct as publicly tearing a flag or throwing it to the ground.

Summary of this case from People v. Street
Case details for

People v. Picking, Picking

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GUY W. PICKING and IDA…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 28, 1942

Citations

42 N.E.2d 741 (N.Y. 1942)
42 N.E.2d 741

Citing Cases

People v. Street

Happily, the courts have not been called upon to apply the statute, or others like it, with any degree of…

People v. Radich

" Halter v. Nebraska ( 205 U.S. 34, supra) relied upon by the People and the majority opinion and followed in…