From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pena

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 27, 1983
98 A.D.2d 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Summary

holding that the defense of duress/necessity is available to a defendant charged with DUI

Summary of this case from Brooks v. State

Opinion

Decided December 27, 1983


JUDGMENT AFFIRMED


Summaries of

People v. Pena

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 27, 1983
98 A.D.2d 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

holding that the defense of duress/necessity is available to a defendant charged with DUI

Summary of this case from Brooks v. State

reversing trial court's refusal to give instruction on defense of necessity to a defendant charged with driving under the influence where he did so to prevent imminent harm to a third party

Summary of this case from Toops v. State

dealing with case of drunken driving

Summary of this case from Stodghill v. State

In People v. Pena (1983) 149 Cal.App.3d Supp. 14 [197 Cal.Rptr. 264], the court discussed the defense of necessity as it applied outside a prison escape setting.

Summary of this case from People v. Garziano

In Pena, the defendant contended he followed a deputy sheriff who had removed his 20-year-old scantily-clad girlfriend from his car in the nighttime after finding the two sleeping at the side of the road, because the deputy's activities during a "weapons search" of the girl while closely examining her "see through" teddy pajamas, led him to fear she might be in danger.

Summary of this case from People v. Slack
Case details for

People v. Pena

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. PENA (BERNARDO)

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 27, 1983

Citations

98 A.D.2d 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

In re Weller

(1a) Petitioners contend that their offer of proof met all the requirements for the defense of necessity and…

Toops v. State

In California for example there is a six-part test: (1) the act charged as criminal must have been done to…