From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Parker

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 28, 2015
498 Mich. 903 (Mich. 2015)

Opinion

Docket No. 151372. COA No. 319089.

10-28-2015

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Saejar Deonte PARKER, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 24, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the Saginaw Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v. Lockridge, 498 Mich. 358, 870 N.W.2d 502 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Parker

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 28, 2015
498 Mich. 903 (Mich. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Saejar Deonte…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Oct 28, 2015

Citations

498 Mich. 903 (Mich. 2015)
870 N.W.2d 912

Citing Cases

Chase v. MaCauley

Nonetheless, given the Lockridge Court of Appeals decision critiquing Herron and the Michigan Supreme Court's…

People v. Parker

Subsequently, our Supreme Court, under Lockridge, remanded this case to the trial court to determine whether…