From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Page

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 9, 1962
17 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

October 9, 1962


Order, entered on January 24, 1961, denying, without a hearing, the defendant's motion for a writ of error coram nobis, unanimously reversed, on the law; motion granted to the extent of vacating the sentence of the defendant; and the case remanded to the Indictment Part of the Supreme Court for resentencing. The defendant, on appearing for sentencing following his plea of guilty, requested leave to withdraw such plea and it was denied. Then, before sentencing, he made it clear to the court that he desired that his counsel be forthwith dismissed. This was not allowed and, thus, the defendant's representation at the time of sentencing was not by counsel of his choice. The foregoing appears from the minutes and a remand for a hearing is unnecessary. The error, though it appears on the face of the record, is the basis for coram nobis relief, and the case should be remanded for resentencing. ( People v. Hannigan, 7 N.Y.2d 317; see, also, 27 Brooklyn L. Rev. 135.)

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Page

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 9, 1962
17 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

People v. Page

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERNEST PAGE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 9, 1962

Citations

17 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Citing Cases

People v. Thomas

etained counsel's right, and indeed may have been his duty, to make a record of a formal request for an…

People v. San Souci

It is the undoubted constitutional right of a defendant to be represented by an attorney at the time of the…